Hindsight from The New Gun Week
May 1, 2000

Gun Business at a Standstill In Massachusetts, Suit Likely
by Joseph P. Tartaro, Executive Editor

The handgun business in Massachusetts is at a standstill because of the sudden implementation of new regulations by the state attorney general. Gunowners and would-be gunowners can't buy, since both new and used handguns are affected. And every pistol or revolver in a dealer's inventory represents a potential $5,000 fine.

It appears that it will take some time before the situation is clarified.

Dealers, distributors and manufacturers are totally confused and apparently get little, if any, help from the attorney general's staff, which deflects rather than answers questions.

Gun dealers in the state and Gun Owners Action League (GOAL) are planning to file suit.

Licensed dealers all across Massachusetts blasted state Attorney General Thomas Reilly at an April 18 press conference hosted by GOAL, saying the state's new gun regulations promulgated as consumer protection will do little more than wreck their businesses, according to a report in The Boston Herald.

"This is not a firearms issue. This is a business issue," said Joe Callanan of Roache's Sporting Goods in Cambridge. "This is simply a very clear case of abuse of government authority."

Callanan and other gun dealers say the AG's office has done little to help them understand which firearms are covered by the regulations, The Herald reported.

State of Confusion

An Associated Press report out of Springfield, MA, reflects the same state of confusion.

Gun dealers are clearing their shelves and some gunmakers have been effectively shut out of the Massachusetts market as the nation's toughest handgun "safety" regulations take effect, AP reported.

The new rules mandate trigger locks, loaded chamber indicators, magazine disconnects and various other "child-proofing" measures and melting-point/accuracy tests, as well as hidden, "tamper-resistant" serial numbers, on all handguns sold in Massachusetts. The regulations took effect immediately after being announced on April 3, with Reilly promising that his investigators would begin store inspections and enforcement by the middle of April.

Apparently, the Massachusetts AG's office has little acquaintance with the realities of manufacturing. Gun manufacturers cannot put hidden serial numbers on guns by waving a magic wand. If the regulations are read as strictly as Reilly claims they will be, even high quality pistols with loaded chamber indicators, magazine disconnects and trigger locks that don't have hidden serial numbers would be ineligible for display and sale in the state.

The only new handguns that can be sold in Massachusetts under the new "consumer protection" regulations are some models made by Springfield, MA-based Smith & Wesson. Apparently, Smith & Wesson was engraving the hidden serial numbers on some guns before the regulations took effect. However, the company's entire Sigma series and many other models are not legal for sale in the Bay State.

That means even the high-end models of Berettas, Glocks, H&Ks, SIG-Sauers and Taurus pistols used by police, the military and government agents would not pass muster if they were being sold to the general public.

Killing Small Dealers

"It's killing the small dealers," said Vincent DelValle, manager of Strictly Defense in West Springfield, according to AP. "We are stuck with thousands of dollars in guns we can't sell."

Used handguns, police sidearms and models made before September 1998 are exempt from the regulations that went into effect after manufacturers, including Smith & Wesson, lost a two-year court fight to stop them.

Attorney General Reilly realizes many gun manufacturers don't meet the regulations yet.

"It is our hope that all companies will comply," said Ann Donlan, a spokeswoman for Reilly. "But there is no going back as far as we are concerned."

The other major gunmakers say they've been sidelined by such things as how many serial numbers are now required on the firearm and the minimum force needed to pull the trigger.

"It's in the details," said Gary Mehalik, marketing manager for Miami-based Taurus, which has been selling pistols equipped with an internal trigger lock since 1997. "We are able to comply in most regards."

Trigger pull weight is another factor that is included in the state regulations.

Taurus and Glock, which makes the guns that Boston police carry, and SIG-Sauer which arms the Massachusetts state police have all run afoul of a requirement that it take at least 10 pounds of force to pull the trigger.

In part because more women are buying guns, most guns are now sold with a trigger pull of 4 to 6 pounds, with target pistols having pulls as light as 2 pounds.

Richard Callaghan, of Callaghan's Firearms in Marlboro, is one of several gun dealers who have pulled all their new handguns off the shelves in response to the new regulations.

There may be some room for interpretation of the new regulations, but Callaghan is taking no chances.

"I am not going to jeopardize my business and life savings for a fast buck," he said.

The Herald quoted Michale Yacino, executive director of GOAL, as saying that with the exception of some firearms manufactured by Smith & Wesson, "there are no handguns that can clearly be legally purchased today in Massachusetts.

"You're talking about millions of dollars of inventory the state has turned into contraband," he said. "Citizens should find a state-created monopoly very troubling."

When apprized of dealer complaints and plans to sue, Reilly came up with an even more troubling response, suggesting that instead of suing him, they should be suing the gun manufacturers. His suggestion would throw the already chaotic legal situation with respect to guns into total turmoil.

"They've known for a long time this day was coming," Reilly said. "The duty is really on the manufacturer to provide. . . handguns that meet these regulations. They (the dealers) should be at the gun manufacturers complaining. The duty should be on the manufacturer to take these guns back and get them out of here."

Indeed, there were reports-unconfirmed as this column was written-that some distributors and/or manufacturers were accepting returns of handguns from dealers in Massachusetts. One assumes that aside from the expenses involved in the exchange that the guns could then be sold in other states.

But dealers, who want to stay in business in Massachusetts, are still faced with the problem of replacing prohibited guns with others that will conform to the new regulations.

Paul Jannuzzo, vice president and general counsel for Glock, said, according to AP, that his company may send special models to Massachusetts if distributors are interested.

Beretta stopped shipment into Massachusetts for just one reason: Its guns do not have a second hidden serial number.

A spokesman for Beretta USA, based in Accokeek, MD, said Beretta had been trying to comply with requirements in the state's 1998 gun law, which are exceeded and superseded by the new consumer protection regulations.

"Unfortunately, everyone is styling themselves as experts in gun design and we are on the brink of ending up with a confused mix of state, local and federal laws," he said.

Confusion Reigns

Even within the official bureaucracy of Massachusetts things are confusing.

Aides to Jane Perlov, the state's secretary of public safety, say Perlov is drawing up her own list of acceptable firearms based on the less-stringent provisions of the 1998 law. That could include guns that would not be acceptable under the attorney general's new regulations.

The consumers of firearms, who never asked for the AG's protection, and who are now unable to buy the guns they want, are stuck in the middle.

There is, of course, the prospect that the state legislature will step in and do something to bring reality to the situation. Consumers didn't want many of the features, or couldn't afford them.

But the ambitious attorneys general of the Bay State apparently believe that consumers don't know what's good for them-and shouldn't even be asked.

Maybe some of those consumers will make their voices heard during a scheduled Gun Owners Action League rally planned for April 24 at the statehouse.

---

The New Gun Week is published three times a month by the Second Amendment Foundation (SAF) on the 1st, 10th, and 20th. Hindsight is a commentary written by SAF President and Gun Week Executive Editor Joseph P. Tartaro. This commentary may be reprinted so long as credit is given to the author and the publication. For more information or to subscribe, write Gun Week, PO Box 488, Buffalo, NY 14209, or call 716-885-6408 Monday through Friday 9 a.m. to 5 p.m. EST, or inquire on Compuserve to John Krull, Production manager-JohnSAF@Compuserve.com or gunweeksaf@broadviewnet.net

Also, check out the New Gun Week at http://www.GunWeek.com