Editorial from Women and Guns April 01, 1997

by Peggy Tartaro
Executive Editor

From The Editor...

Anyone who has been to a gun shop, sporting goods dealer or gun show in the last two years cannot have failed to notice that there hasn't been a lot new theses venues in that time. A number of factors combined to make the last several years tough times for the firearms industry. The aftermath of the passage of the Brady Act, which saw those who could buy purchase just about anything that went "bang" (good news to sellers at the time, but with the long-term consequence of a slowdown following enactment of Brady). Finally, the passage of the 1994 Omnibus Crime Bill, with its "assault weapons ban" provision made a bid dent in the manufacture of firearms--none of them "assault weapons." Handgun manufacturers who had geared up in the '80s to make big guns with large magazine capacities, were now scrambling both to make smaller guns with magazines of 10 rounds and under, and convince people who had previously been able to buy higher capacity guns that the "new" guns were worth the investment. And, finally, an uncertain economy with very little disposable income available, made people postpone purchases.

Firearms consumers were confused by the whole thing, and waited for someone to come out with something truly new, which unfortunately, took a while.

In the Spring of 1995, smith & Wesson introduced their first Sigma, in .380, with a polymer slide and frame. Glock debuted the models 26 and 27 that summer, both of which, while meeting the new 10-round capacity law, accept the older, larger capacity magazines from Models 17, 19 and 22, a bonus for the legions of Glock devotees who already owned on of the older models. Slowly, other companies brought forward compacts, such as the Kahr 9, into the semi-auto market.

Revolver makers took a different tack; since semis were now limited to 10 rounds, they decided to increase the capacity of some of their products , producing guns with seven-, eight-, and finally 10-round cylinders.

Late last year, the firearms industry began to feel a little better about business, and we began to see more introductions, not just in firearms themselves, but in related products, especially ammunition.

Lest anyone think the industry is going to neglect the women's market, it should be noted that two major introductions made late last year-- one by Glock of their Models 29 and 30 and the other by Federal Cartridge Corporation of their new Personal Defense (tm) Ammunition--included invitations to WOMEN & GUNS to cover the debuts. It is also a fitting tribute by both manufacturers to the depth of knowledge and writing skills of the women invited to both events--Gila May-Hayes. Gila's coverage of the Federal line appeared in last month's issue, and her exploration of the Glocks is coming as soon as she has the opportunity to give them a full workout, including the rigorous 5-in-5-at-5 test.

Gila and I had our annual sitdown at the 1997 SHOT Show at the end of January. The "sit down" portion was most welcome as the SHOT Show is dauntingly monstrous. (I finally, on day three, took to wearing two pairs of socks, which kept my hobbling to a minimum.) Both of us were impressed with the number of introductions and with the positive attitudes of manufacturers an dealers we had a chance to talk with. There will be new--really new--things for Gila to discuss with you in the coming months. And, with the issue, her Personal Trainer column begins a sequence on the shotgun for self-defense, which I know you will find as thorough and useful as previous entries in this skill-enhancing series.

I missed seeing Carolee Boyles-Sprenkel in the crush at the Women's Shooting Sports Foundation reception. I know she's been busy with work on her book, to appear later this year, on hunting. But, she too, will have new items to report on. So will Sheila Link, who ran me to ground in our booth one afternoon and also was enthusiastic about the variety of introductions. As we sat together she was greeted by any number of friends who urged her to stop by and visit with them. Our February issue was available at the show, which featured Sheila's interview with Kim Rhode as our cover story.

Our two-time Olympic cover girl was a the show, signing autographs to long and enthusiastic lines. We had planned to get together, but our schedules kept us apart. I did have a nice talk with her father, Richard, the very picture of a proud papa. Kim has been busy with a host of post-Olympic activities, including an incredible amount of charity work, especially children's charities. And, like any 17-year-old, she's also studying for her SATs and perusing college catalogs. Richard said she has curtailed her pre-Atlanta training regimen somewhat, but still took the California State Double Trap Championship. I expect we will continue to see the achievements of this young woman in our pages for years to come.

One other W&G alumna was at SHOT--publisher Julianne Versnel Gottlieb. We hadn't been face-to-face since last fall, even though we talk (and increasingly, Email) often. What was to be a planned, brief sabbatical from our back page "Parting Shot" column, has now run longer than either of us would like. Among her many other hat-wearing activities (and Julie is one of those people who look great in hats, which is probably why she has to wear so many) has been that of overseer of postal changes, not just for this magazine, but for all Foundation business. Like those ducks pedaling furiously beneath the seemingly-calm water, she's had to manage the last eight months of new and often conflicting regulations, software, staff, mainframes, etc., and done her usual great job (wearing, no doubt her Mary Engelbreit "Oh, No!" baseball cap). The best laid plans of editors and publishers are subject to all sorts of vagaries, but "Parting Shot" will return, very soon, I hope. (And in that column's best tradition: "P.S. to JVH: thanks for the loan of the shoulder, sorry it got damps.")

The week before the SHOT Show, a chilly Buffalo hosted the 10th annual American society of Law Enforcement Trainers (ASLET) convention. Two other W&G stalwarts were in attendance: Lyn Bates and Roger Lanny, I managed to spirit them away from dinner one night, which as the first time we had all been in the same place since I first met them in 1990.

Dinner was pleasant, the conversation and company great, even if my tour guiding skills were not up to par.

Both Roger and Lyn had good ideas for new projects for these pages, that you will also be seeing in the coming months.

I had the good fortune to observe most of Lyn's class dealing with teaching women law enforcement recruits shooting. The audience--made up mainly of men whose job it was to teach others the skills required, were attentive and many gathered around Lyn after the session to ask further questions. Lyn used a number of slides in her presentation, and one was particularly instructive: if featured a male officer's duty belt festooned with all of the accounterments many officers now carry: holster and gun, baton, spray, walkie-talkie, flashlight, etc. Below the image was one of a female officer's belt, which could not have supported that much gear. Obviously, all women are not the same as each other, let alone the same as their brother officers. Lyn mentioned the opportunity she had to do a ride-along with some Buffalo officers. One was a woman, who when they compared hands, seemed to be exactly the same as Lyn; however, during their discussion, Lyn found that while the officer was comfortable drawing and shooting her duty gun, it was not a model which comfortably fit Lyn's hands.

I hope Lyn's "Defensive Strategies" column in coming months will highlight some of her other remarks, especially her views on the language differences between men and women and how it could impact training. And, if you ever get a chance to take a class Lyn is giving, be sure to do so! In case you think I'm tooting our own horn, unprompted, a friend who had attended some of the ASLET sessions mentioned that a fellow law enforcement professional had told him Lyn's course was the most useful he attended during the event.

Our editors appear poised to report and instruct on a number of subjects--new and old--to you this year and I hope you will stay tuned and enjoy their expertise.

Peggy Tartaro,
Executive Editor


Return to SAF.org