QUICK SHOTS

JANUARY 2000  

July 2000

FEBRUARY 2000      

August 2000

March 2000

September 2000

April 2000

October 2000

May 2000

November 2000

June 2000

December 2000

Quick Shots 1999

Quick Shots 1998


January 2000

The nation's death rate from the misuse of firearms fell 21 percent between 1993 and 1997, according to a report by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The report also showed the injury rate from firearm misuse plunging 41 percent during the same period.
"Our study pretty much showed there's been a substantial drop in both fatal and nonfatal firearms injuries ... to see both of them coming down together really indicates we're making good progress. It's very exciting," said J. Lee Annest, chief statistician for the CDC's National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, according to The Washington Times.
The study in the CDC's "Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report" estimated deaths from firearm-related injuries in 1997 at 32,436, down 18 percent from a record 39,595 deaths in 1993. The rate of gun deaths fell from 15.4 per 100,000 population six years ago to 12.1 per 100, 000 in 1997.
The report, which Annest authored, showed that the number of nonfatal firearm injuries treated in U.S. hospital emergency rooms dropped from 104,390 in 1993 to 64,207 in 1997. He noted that the rate of such incidents fell from 40.5 per 100,000 people to 24 per 100,000 between 1993 and 1997.




In Veghel, Netherlands, a teenage student carrying a handgun opened fire at a high school on December 7,1999, wounding a teacher and four fellow students in the first school shooting in Dutch history, reported the International Herald Tribune.
In a drama unprecedented in Holland, "known for its strict gun control laws," according to the Tribune, the 17year-old suspect fired more than 10 times before surrendering to the police outside the school in Veghel, 60 miles south of Amsterdam.
Two students were in critical condition. The teacher and another student were in stable condition. A fourth student was grazed.
Dutch police officers investigating the incident said they were surprised by the explanation they heard from a brother of one of the five victims, who said a long family feud between Turkish families had inspired the rampage.
Authorities were questioning both the 17-year-old suspect and his father, who reportedly drove his son to the school, waited outside in the family's Mercedes sedan while the shooting took place, and then drove his son to the local police station where he surrendered peacefully. The police did not say whether the father could face charges as an accessory.




In Maryland, the City of Takoma Park and Citizens Against Handguns have agreed not to challenge Circuit Court Judge Vincent E. Ferretti, Jr.'s ruling that they could not use elections to ask voters whether handguns should be banned in Takoma Park or whether state law should be changed to allow them to do so.
Judge Ferretti issued the restraining order -which kept Takoma Park residents from voting on a city ban last November 2 -because Maryland law prohibits municipal and county governments from regulating guns and from using elections to conduct opinion polls.
The city and the anti-gun group have signed a court agreement not to put the question on the ballot in the future, but city attorney Susan Silber said the City Council is still looking for a way to use local government authority to restrict guns in Takoma Park and for changes they may be able to advocate and win in state law.




In New York, according to a Reuters report, a Manhattan judge has granted a prosecutor's request to dismiss charges against a Fifth Avenue art gallery owner who displayed live bullets in a candy bowl as part of a sculpture exhibition.
Mary Boone was arrested last September 30, after the police said they recovered 234 rounds of live 9mm ammunition from a glass vase at Boone's gallery. They also found four double-barreled shotguns, two of which were operable. Boone was charged with the disposal of live ammunition and possession of an exposed rifle, which she said were all part of a show by the sculptor Tom Sachs.
The gallery's spokesman, Ron Warren, said the bullets were a commentary on popular culture. He said that having the ammunition in a candy bowl was like saying "bullets are as casual as a piece of candy."
Boone could have faced up to a year in prison and a $1,000 fine if she had been convicted. On December 6, though, a judge granted the Manhattan district attorney's request to dismiss the charges. "It's a win for the First Amendment, " Boone said after the ruling.




In back-to-back victories for the firearms industry last month, judges in two states dismissed lawsuits against gun manufacturers and dealers.
A state judge in Florida tossed out a suit by Miami-Dade County on December 13, three days after a Connecticut state judge dismissed a similar lawsuit brought by the mayor and city of Bridgeport.
The two lawsuits mirror other suits filed by municipalities that allege that guns have created a public nuisance, threatening residents' health and safety, and that gun manufacturers, like polluters, should have to pay for the cleanup.
In their separate decisions, the judges in Florida and Connecticut reached the same conclusion: The governments lack standing to sue.
"The plaintiffs have no statutory or common-law basis to recoup their expenditures," ruled the judge in Bridgeport. "Public nuisance does not apply to the design, manufacture and distribution of a lawful product," said the Florida judge.


GO BACK TO TOP


February 2000

When anti-gun Rep. Charles E. Schumer of New York was running for the U. S. Senate from New York in 1998, reported THE NEW YORK TIMES, "he was probably aware when he spoke with securities industry lobbyists about deregulation that the industry had donated $1.28 million to his campaigns over the previous five years - even if not all of those donations were motivated by concern about -the issue.
"Mr. Schumer was on the House Banking Committee and is now on the Senate Banking Committee. He has long been regarded as the securities industry's strongest ally in Congress. Of course, most brokerage and financial services companies are based in New York City, parts of which Mr. Schumer represented in the House. He received more money from the securities industry in 1997 and 1998 than anyone else now in the Senate, almost certainly because he was running for the Senate."




Late last year, the Illinois State Senate refused to reenact a law that would make illegal possession of handguns a felony.
Gov. George Ryan predicted he had the votes necessary for passage of the legislation, which the Illinois Supreme Court struck down early last December on technical grounds. The state law that made unlawful gun possession a felony had been on the books since 1994.
Ryan had called a special legislative session to consider reenactment of the measure. This session involved only the Senate since the House already had passed the bill in an earlier special session.
However, in the Senate on December 29, 1999, the bill fell five votes short of the 36 required for ratification, despite intense gubernatorial lobbying.
Leading the fight against the bill was the Majority Whip, State Sen. Ed Petka, a former prosecutor who has sponsored measures that impose stiff penalties for the use of guns in the commission of crimes but who said "I think that transporting a firearm for whatever reason should not be a felony."
Both sides in the debate said the issue would be on the agenda again this year. Petka told POINT BLANK the Ryan proposal would be "more difficult" to defeat this year.




In California, there is a conflict brewing within the camp of the gun grabbers, according to THE WASHINGTON POST.
Last year, the gun grabbers, with the all-out support of Gov. Gray Davis, enacted a barrage of laws designed to reduce the proliferation of firearms. It included a tough ban on so-called "assault weapons," a limit on handgun purchases in the state to one a month, a prohibition on the manufacture or sale of certain inexpensive handguns, and a requirement that all guns made or sold in California have safety locks.
Now legislator& say they want to impose more extensive registration and new licensing requirements on prospective gun owners, force gun owners to take more safety tests, pay higher fees and renew a gun license every year or few years.
"But," reported the POST, "Davis sounds worried that the legislature is going too far, too fast...He ... apparently fears that approving another wave of gun laws could galvanize conservative voters at a time when the looming presidential race in make-or-break California looks quite competitive."




The Clinton-Gore Administration said late last year that it was tripling the budget for the development of a unified national data base of shell casings and bullets to be known as the National Integrated Ballistics Information Network.
An Administration official said the new system, to be run by BATF, "will work toward creating a virtual fingerprint for newly manufactured handguns by using a computer analysis of the unique markings a gun leaves on shell casings when it is fired," reported THE NEW YORK TIMES.
Paul Jannuzzo, General Counsel of Glock, Inc., said that, "as long as this is aimed at crime control, not gun control, we will support it."
A former prosecutor, he said that providing BATF gun fingerprints "will speed up the gun tracing process incredibly."
He added that giving the government the information also could help the firearms industry in a complex set of lawsuits filed against it by 28 cities and counties as welI as by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, and in parallel negotiations between lawyers for the cities and the gun companies.
The cities have demanded that the firearm -manufacturers develop a serial number that would be harder to obliterate.
"If you have a system with gun fingerprints, it is better than serial numbers that can be tampered with," Jannuzzo said. "it may also do away with another demand by the people who want to put us out of business, registration of all gun owners, because you already have the gun registered. "
The new system relies on the computer analysis of marks made on shell casings, including those caused by firing pins and those pressed on the breach face of the casing during an explosion, as well as another unique signature left when the casing is ejected.

GO BACK TO TOP


May 2000

In Washington, D. C., Congressman Bill McCollum of Florida, a CCRKBA Gun Rights Defender of the Year Awardee, spoke out forcefully in support of his bill, H.R. 4051, to establish a grant program that provides incentives for states to enact mandatory minimum sentences for certain firearm offenses.

The measure, titled “Project Exile: The Safe Streets and Neighborhoods Act of 2000,” would provide $100 million in grants over five years to states imposing a mandatory minimum five-year prison sentence, without parole, for anyone who uses or carries a firearm during a violent or serious drug-trafficking crime.

McCollum, Chairman of the Judiciary Committee’s Crime Subcommittee, said the bill combined the proven approaches of enforcing gun laws already on the books and ensuring mandatory minimum sentences for criminals who break them.

The model for the bill is Project Exile, a gun crime mandatory sentencing program in Richmond, Virginia that supporters say is responsible, since its inception in 1997, for significantly reducing violent crime in a city that had one of the highest crime rates in the country.

Virginia Gov. James Gilmore, who last July signed into law a statewide “Virginia Exile” program, told a hearing of the Subcommittee on April 6 that H.R. 4051, in enacted into law, would show “how valuable Exile can be in assisting them in the link between guns, drugs and violent crime.”

Currently six states, including Virginia, Texas, Florida, Louisiana, South Caroline and Colorado, would qualify for the funding.

McCollum is a candidate this year for the U. S. Senate.




Gun grabber Rosie O’Donnell of TV talk show notoriety was billed as a featured speaker for the May 14 anti-gun “Million Mom March” in Washington, D. C.

Promoters of the March urged America’s mothers to “gas up the minivans and carpool it” to the Nation’s Capital to shame Congress into enacting gun control laws.

Opposing this group is the Second Amendment Sisters (http://www.sas-aim.org), a grass roots self-defense advocacy organization that held an Armed Informed Mothers March as a counter to the Million Mom March.




U.S. Rep. Joseph M. Hoeffel III of Pennsylvania introduced H. R. 4137, a bill to make federal law apply to antique firearms in the same way as it applies to other firearms. It was referred to the House Judiciary Committee. Cosponsors include Reps. Robert A. Borski of Pennsylvania, Robert A. Brady of Pennsylvania, Julia M. Carson of Indiana, Eliot Engel of New York, Chaka Fattah of Pennsylvania, William O. Lipinski of Illinois, Edward J. Markey of Massachusetts, Juanita Millender-McDonald of California, Jerrold Nadler of New York, Janice D. Schakowsky of Illinois, and Henry A. Waxman of California.




U.S. Rep. Xavier Becerra of California introduced H.R. 4150, the proposed “Bullet Tracing Act to Reduce Gun Violence,” which would require ballistics testing of firearms manufactured in or imported into the United States that are “most commonly used in crime,” and to provide for the compilation, use, and availability of ballistics information for the purpose of “curbing the use of firearms in crime.”

Referred to the House Judiciary Committee, H.R. 4150 would require BATF to compile and cause to be published in the Federal Register, on an annual basis, a list of the 50 firearms, by manufacturer and model name, most frequently used by criminals in the United States.

It would provide that a licensed firearm manufacturer or importer shall not transfer to any person a firearm of a make or model that is on the most recently issued list before test firing the firearm, preparing ballistics records of the fired bullet and cartridge casings from the test fire, and making the records available to BATF for entry in a computerized database.

Early in 1999, U.S. Sen. Craig Thomas of Wyoming requested the General Accounting Office (GAO) to conduct an audit to examine whether the National Instant Check System (NICS) is designed efficiently and managed effectively by the FBI. The completed study indicates there are a number of significant problems with NICS, preventing it from operating as Congress intended.

Among them are that 1.2 million, or 28 percent, of all federal firearm checks were not instant; 1,505 individuals were denied the opportunity to purchase firearms as a result of FBI examiner error or misidentification; as of December 31, 1999, BATF reported that 3,353 prohibited individuals had obtained firearms, but only had active criminal investigations on 110, or only 3.3 percent of these individuals; NICS failed to meet its operating accountability standards two-thirds of the time between November 30, 1998 and November 30, 1999; and, although NICS has been operational for 15 months, it has yet to be authorized as secure in accordance with the FBI’s own routine requirements for computer security.

Sen. Thomas cautioned that “the new NICS report should weigh heavily in the President’s current push for additional laws to affect gun purchases and address violence.” He stated further “if during our oversight of current gun control laws it’s found that criminals still get guns and a high number of legal gun purchases are denied, you have to question the effectiveness of additional layers of gun regulation. We have got to get serious about targeting and prosecuting the criminals and addressing the drug trade that often precipitates violence.”

GO BACK TO TOP


June 2000

On April 26, seven firearm manufacturers and the National Shooting Sports Foundation (NSSF) filed a lawsuit in federal court against HUD Secretary Andrew Cuomo, New York Attorney General Eliot Spitzer, Connecticut Attorney General Richard Blumenthal and government officials from 14 municipalities. The suit arises from the defendants’ stated intent to give preferential consideration when awarding contracts to purchase firearms for law enforcement agencies to those companies that agree to anti-gun terms of a “code of conduct” established by the government officials.

NSSF, Beretta U.S.A. Corp., Browning Arms, Inc., Colt’s Manufacturing Company, Inc., Glock, Inc., SIG Arms, Inc., Sturm, Ruger & Company, Inc., and Taurus International Manufacturing, Inc. allege that Cuomo and the others are involved in an illegal conspiracy in restraint of trade and are in violation of the Commerce Clause of the U.S. Constitution.

The plaintiffs are asking the court to permanently enjoin the defendants from any action to establish regulations on the design, manufacture, advertising and distribution of handguns beyond what has been established by Congress.




HUD Secretary Andrew Cuomo’s chief bodyguard several times while on duty has forgotten his .38-caliber revolver, leaving it where others could easily find it, HUD employees reportedly say.

In the most recent incident, reports George Archibald in THE WASHINGTON TIMES, “Clarence Day, a 68-year-old retired Metropolitan Police officer and close confidant of Mr. Cuomo, left the loaded pistol in the cafeteria of the Department of Housing and Urban Development and tried to retaliate against security officials who made a formal incident report, the employees said.

“They said Mr. Day forgot his gun, which he carries in a small handbag, on at least two other occasions when he was traveling with the HUD secretary. The bag was found by federal motor pool employees and returned to him without an official incident report, the employees said.

“The incident and existence of a formal report have embarrassed Mr. Cuomo, who has made a big issue of gun safety and recently joined President Clinton in efforts to restrict availability of firearms to the general public.

“On February 9, the gun was found that day by another cafeteria patron and turned over to HUD’s security office. The gun was found in a black canvas bag with the official U.S. government eagle surrounded by the words, ‘U.S. Department of State Diplomatic Service,’ the report said…

“Mr. Cuomo and his assistant secretary for administrative services, Joseph Smith, personally interviewed three security and building services employees in an effort to pressure them to change it, an official said…

“Mr. Day ‘exploded’ after the gun incident report was placed in official files as an ‘adversarial report,’ one agency employee said. ‘He went ballistic. He threatened retaliation.’”




In late April, “thanks to technology and detective work,” reports THE NEW YORK TIMES, “an antique rifle fired at Custer’s last stand shattered the record for a historical American firearm.

“The brass and wood Winchester Model 66, one of only 15 guns forensically proved to have actually been at General George A. Custer’s crushing defeat on June 25, 1876, sold to an anonymous buyer for $684,500 at James D. Julia, Inc. in Fairfield, Maine. The price was more than double the previous record and 100 times what similar Winchesters usually garner.




Police in Lycoming County, Pennsylvania were on the lookout for two men who got more than they bargained for when they tried to break into two separate homes, reported WBRE-TV.

Charles Hill, 80, described the rude awakening he received. “I saw them banging against the door and I stepped over and hollered, ‘what do you think you are doing out there – you know I have a gun in here.’”

When he heard the two men trying to break in he grabbed his .22-caliber rifle and defended his home .

After they fled in a small dark-colored car Hill didn’t stop. He said, “when they went up the hill over there, I fired,” hoping to put telltale bullet holes in the pair’s getaway car. But he was unsuccessful.

A short time later, state police believe the same two men sized up another home about 10 miles away near Cogan Station.

According to police, they broke in and fought 75-year-old John Umstead. He managed to fight off the attackers but not before suffering a blow to the head and a kick to the ribs.

Hill said, “the cop asked me if the gun was loaded, and I said you’re happy tootin’ it’s loaded.” He locks his doors, but added, “if they get inside and if I have a gun I won’t aim to kill, but I will aim to cripple.”

Hill said he had no regrets about grabbing his rifle even before dialing 911. “I would do the same thing again…I wouldn’t hesitate.”

GO BACK TO TOP


July 2000

Background checks blocked 204,000 of the more than 8.6 million prospective firearm sales last year, according to a U.S. Justice Department report that shows state and local police rejected a higher percentage of would-be gun buyers than the FBI.

The 1999 figures brought the number of purchases rejected since the Brady Act instituted background checks in February, 1994 to 536,000 out of nearly 22.3 million applications, the department’s Bureau of Justice Statistics reported last month. That confirmed earlier estimates of more than 500,000 rejections, according to the Associated Press.

The FBI performed 4.5 million of the 8.6 million background checks last year, compared with 4.1 million by state and local agencies. The rejection rate among state and local agencies was three percent, compared with 1.8 percent for the FBI.

The report attributed this difference to state agencies’ access to more detailed criminal history records than the FBI, including fugitive status, court restraining orders, mental illness and domestic violence misdemeanor convictions as well as felony convictions.

The overall national rejection rate has remained 2.4 percent since 1994, despite the November 30, 1998 switch to computerized instant checks and the addition then of checks on long gun purchasers. Only handgun buyers were checked before that.




The U.S. Supreme Court unanimously rejected the Justice Department’s understanding of a law that imposes a mandatory 30-year sentence for using a machine gun in connection with a crime of violence. The department argued that the law simply provides an enhanced sentence, which is to be imposed by the trial judge.

However, in an opinion by Justice Stephen G. Breyer, the court found that in this 1988 law, Congress intended to make the use of a machine gun not just a sentencing factor, but a “separate substantive crime,” to be charged separately and proven to a jury. The decision overturned a ruling by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, in New Orleans.

The decision in the case, Castillo v. United States, No. 99-658, vacated 30-year sentences given to four members of the Branch Davidians, who were convicted of voluntary manslaughter in the deaths of four federal agents in the 1993 raid on the group’s compound near Waco, Texas.




In Kentucky, police and sheriff’s departments early last month were preparing thousands of firearms for an auction ordered by the state Assembly, with the proceeds to be used for buying bulletproof vests for law enforcement officers.

Under a state law taking effect on the 15th of this month, the police agencies will have 90 days to turn over firearms they have seized or confiscated once they no longer need the weapons as evidence. That, reports USA TODAY, includes stolen firearms if the rightful owners cannot be found.

The guns then will be auctioned by a state agency to Kentucky’s 1,800 licensed gun dealers. The money raised will be used to buy the bulletproof vests.

Kentucky held a similar auction last year, selling 202 guns seized by the state police and raising $34,000. Louisville alone would turn over 1,500 guns. Lexington would have 1,200, and Jefferson County, which surrounds Louisville, would have 500.




In a recent Handgun Control, Inc. fundraising letter, HCI Chair Sarah Brady states the group seeks to “eliminate the gun show loophole,” secure passage of “a permanent waiting period” for firearm purchases, and enact requirements to “license new gun owners” and “register guns the way cars are registered.”

Brady states “our goal is to hold all gun manufacturers liable for the damage that results from negligent design and marketing of their deadly products…

“What’s more, we’re equally determined to take the next step towards a safer gun by demanding the careful regulation of guns by the Consumer Product Safety Commission.”

GO BACK TO TOP


August 2000

In Washington, D. C., CCRKBA announced its support of H.R. 4790, by Rep. Saxby Chambliss of Georgia, to recognize the hunting heritage and to provide opportunities for continued hunting on public lands.

Referred to the Committee on Resources, co-sponsors include Reps. Randy Cunningham of California, Mark Green of Wisconsin, James V. Hansen of Utah, Collin Peterson of Minnesota, Charles “Chip” Pickering, Jr. of Mississippi, John R. Thune of South Dakota, and Don Young of Alaska.




In California, the State Supreme Court on June 29 overturned a 1998 ruling by the California Third Appellate Court of Appeal that had struck down certain provisions of the State’s Roberti-Roos Assault Weapons Control Act.

According to the 1998 ruling, a provision of the 1989 law that allowed the State’s Attorney General, with a judge’s consent, to add guns to the list of banned firearms was unconstitutional because it violated the separation of powers between the State Legislature and the Judiciary. The 1998 Appellate Court ruling suggested that the law unconstitutionally “violates equal protection” because the banned firearms are indistinguishable from other guns not affected by the law.

The June 29 ruling, however, held that the law did not improperly delegate legislative authority to the courts, did not violate equal protection guarantees when it left unaffected guns that are virtually identical to banned firearms, and did not violate due process protections despite leaving unclear which guns were banned.

Following the June 29 ruling, attorneys questioning the law’s constitutionality indicated that other lawsuits challenging the ban are being considered and that an appeal of the ruling in question may be filed with the U.S. Supreme Court.




In New York State, State Senate Majority Leader Joe Bruno agreed with the Pataki Gubernatorial Administration and the State Assembly to pass a modified version of Gov. Pataki’s gun control package on a 39-20 vote. The package includes a ban on so-called “assault weapons,” a requirement for retail firearm dealers to sell locking devices with all new guns, a “ballistic fingerprinting” plan that critics claim amounts to “backdoor registration,” NICS checks on all sales at gun shows, and a new age requirement of 21 for eligibility to receive a handgun license, which is required for simple possession under New York State law.

Later, New York State Attorney General Eliot L. Spitzer sued the gun industry, making the Empire State the first state to sue the firearms industry, claiming manufacturers and wholesalers created “a condition of danger.”

The state is seeking changes in the way manufacturers market and distribute guns, but its lawsuit does not ask for monetary damages.

Among the manufacturers named in the lawsuit are Glock, Beretta U.S.A., Colt’s Manufacturing, Taurus, Ruger & Co., and Intratec.




In New York City, anti-gun Mayor Rudolph Giuliani announced that his city would become the 32nd municipality to file a reckless lawsuit against members of the firearms industry. The suit cites “deceptive marketing,” “irresponsible supervision of sales,” and “design flaws” as the causes of gun deaths and injuries. The Center to Prevent Handgun Violence, a legal ally of Handgun Control, Inc., signed onto Giuliani’s suit as co-counsel.

In reaction, U.S. Rep. Bob Barr of Georgia, a CCRKBA Legislator of the Year Awardee who is author of a bill, H.R. 1032, to eliminate these ridiculous lawsuits, stated in a letter to Giuliani that “your claim that manufacturers should somehow be held legally responsible because different states regulate their products in different ways is absurd. As a former United States Attorney, you are undoubtedly aware that making manufacturers of legal, proper functioning products liable for the unforeseen actions of criminals is an action completely unsupported by any significant law or precedent. These lawsuits against gun manufacturers represent a direct attack on the successful free market system that your city embodies…Please show some respect for the free enterprise system and the Constitution by dropping this lawsuit.”




In Brasilia, Brazil, the national government June 20 decreed an immediate ban on the sale of firearms.

The ban will remain in effect until the end of this year, Justice Minister Jose Gregori announced at a news conference. By then, the government hopes to have won congressional approval of a more restrictive bill that would virtually ban the possession of firearms by any Brazilian citizen who is not a member of the armed forces, a police officer or an employee of a private security company.

Freedom-loving Brazilian patriots inform POINT BLANK that they, in the meantime, may attempt to develop a gun lobby in Brazil drawn primarily from the millions of Brazilians who now own guns in an attempt to thwart the government’s politically correct gun-grabbing agenda.




Handgun Control, Inc. recently awarded President Bill Clinton, the gun-grabber-in-chief, its “James and Sarah Brady Lifetime Achievement Award.”




According to a survey conducted by America On Line after the Million Mom March, which actually had far less than a million marchers, only 27.6 percent of the nearly 20,000 respondents indicated support for positions taken by the March and its organizers.

When asked what Congress should do to curb gun violence, 21.1 percent answered “require registration and safety training,” and 6.5 percent answered “ban all guns,” two March positions.

On the other hand, 61.3 percent answered “enforce existing regulations,” 9.5 percent answered “gun safety training in schools,” and 1.6 percent were not sure.

GO BACK TO TOP


September 2000

“Accidental deaths caused by doctors and hospitals in America reached 120,000 per year,” stated Rep. James A. Traficant, Jr. of Ohio in a July 26 speech on the floor of the U.S. House of Representatives. “Meanwhile,” he continued, “gun deaths have dropped 35 percent. In fact, accidental gun deaths dropped to 1,500 last year.

“Think about it. We have got hospitals slicing and dicing American people like Freddie Kruger, and Congress is passing more gun laws. Beam me up. There is something wrong in America when one is 80 times more likely to be killed by a doctor than Smith & Wesson. Maybe we need a gun in surgery.

“I yield back the fact that the Second Amendment was not written to cover just duck hunters.”




Pro-gun Rep. John D. Dingell of Michigan sent an August 2 letter to anti-gun U.S. Attorney General Janet Reno asking her “why the Department of Justice is not doing more to prosecute” individuals who violate federal law prohibiting them from obtaining firearms.

In June, the Bureau of Justice Statistics reported on Federal Firearm Offenders and on Background Checks for Firearm Transfers. According to these reports, the National Instant Check System (NICS) identifies and denies convicted murderers, rapists and other violent criminals who attempt to purchase firearms from Federal Firearm License (FFL) holders. Such an attempt by such individuals itself is a violation of federal law, 18 U.S.C. 922(a)(6). Less than one percent of those so rejected, however, are prosecuted at the federal level.

“I want to know why,” said Dingell, “when the law clearly states it is a federal felony to falsify information on a firearm transfer application, the Justice Department has chosen not to prosecute these offenders. In 1999, 86 percent of the people rejected by the National Instant Criminal Background Check System (NICS) had lied on their application and are thereby punishable by law, yet less than one percent were prosecuted. NICS is one of the most effective tools we have to crack down on gun criminals and prevent crime, but it only works if we use it.”

In the letter, Dingell responded to Deputy Attorney General Eric Holder’s statement that “the Brady Law has stopped 536,000 felons, fugitives, domestic abusers and other persons not legally allowed to have a gun from getting a gun,” by noting that stopping the sale of a gun to a prohibited person is only one factor of an effective strategy to reduce violent criminal behavior. Prosecuting those felons, fugitives and domestic abusers who attempt, by falsifying their application to purchase a firearm, is equally important.




“In a pleasantly meandering conversation over lunch in San Francisco last summer,” reports nationally syndicated columnist George F. Will, “Condoleezza Rice, then still provost of Stanford but already unofficially what she now is officially, George W. Bush’s senior policy adviser, was asked her thoughts about gun control. ‘I am,’ she answered crisply, ‘a Second Amendment absolutist.’ Growing up in Birmingham, Alabama in the early 1960s, when racial tensions rose, there were, she said, occasions when the black community had to exercise its right to bear arms in self-defense, becoming, if you will, a well-regulated militia.”




In defying the publicly expressed will of certain Members of Congress, the Clinton-Gore Administration said it will continue paying local governments to buy back guns from private owners despite orders from budget appropriators in the House of Representatives to end the program.

In June, Rep. James Walsh of New York, Chairman of the Appropriations Subcommittee which oversees the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), along with Rep. Alan Mollohan of West Virginia, the Ranking Member, and Rep. Tom DeLay of Texas, the House Majority Whip, wrote HUD Secretary Andrew Cuomo that funding the gun surrender program, known as “Buyback America,” was not authorized by law, a position supported by the General Accounting Office, a nonpartisan congressional research agency.

Walsh stated that HUD is misspending federal funds by diverting $15 million earmarked for a program designed to fight drugs in public housing to pay for “Buyback America.”

Walsh said that, “drug elimination funds are for eliminating drugs…Gun buyback programs, whether you agree or disagree with them, do not qualify under that funding scheme.” He noted also he felt that, “gun buybacks are sort of silly” because criminals are not going to turn in their firearms for the HUD-suggested price of fifty dollars.

President Clinton, on the other hand, stated that, “despite HUD’s clear authority to carry out this important program, the gun lobby and other opponents of common-sense gun safety measures continue to challenge this initiative.”

Walsh denied he has been pressured by the gun lobby on the issue. He said the Clinton-Gore Administration “has found the gun lobby to be an excellent whipping boy, but I have not consistently supported or opposed the gun lobby. This is just an appropriator’s responsibility to make sure that funds are spent appropriately.”

GO BACK TO TOP


October 2000

Handgun Control, Inc. thinks its work can make gun control “one of the top three or four issues” on which people base their vote in the November 7 elections, HCI’s communications director, Naomi Paiss, stated recently in an article appearing in PR Week.

She reportedly stated also that HCI’s communications strategy could be “radically different” starting on November 8. The publication reported that “a Gore victory, particularly with significant changes in Congress, would embolden HCI to push for closing the loophole on gun sales and perhaps further-reaching proposals. A Bush victory would push HCI to ‘fight ferociously to keep what we’ve got.’”




In California, Assemblyman Jack Scott, conceding that Gov. Gray Davis would not support his gun control proposal this year, has abandoned for now a state bill to require a safety test and a license for handgun owners.

The state Senate already had approved the bill, but Davis announced he would do nothing to advance the bill in the Assembly.

“Based on conversations with the governor’s office, I reluctantly have become convinced that my best chance for seeing this bill become law is to pursue it next year,” said Scott.

Last year, a number of severely restrictive firearm bills were enacted into law in California. Scott’s new bill would have required every Californian who buys a handgun to pass a four-to-eight-hour safety class.




In Maryland, U.S. Rep. Robert L. Ehrlich, Jr. is criticizing Project Disarm, a program run by U.S. Attorney Lynne Battaglia, as less effective in fighting crime than Project Exile, aimed at making streets safer by prosecuting, under tough federal provisions, virtually all felons caught carrying guns. Battaglia reportedly riled some BATF officials last summer when she said federal prosecutors, rather than BATF agents, could better determine which cases to prosecute under Disarm, which supposedly is more selective than Exile about taking felons with firearms to federal court.




In Virginia, gun control advocates James and Sarah Brady formally endorsed the campaign of anti-gun U.S. Sen. Chuck Robb for reelection. Robb, according to the Washington Post, “has been a consistent supporter of gun control measures, having voted for the Brady Bill, which requires background checks on handgun buyers; for an extension of that law to cover Internet sales of guns; and for the assault weapon ban.”

Robb’s opponent, former Governor George Allen, in 1997 vetoed a bill that would have outlawed guns in Fairfax County’s recreation centers. In 1995, he signed a law that allows qualified Virginians to obtain permits to carry concealed weapons.




About nine out of 10 high school students support such gun control measures as criminal background checks and mandatory trigger locks, according to a survey released in late August.

The same number of students said they favored requiring a safety course and a license to purchase a handgun. Ninety-six percent supported registering firearms when purchased so they could be traced, if “necessary,” said Dennis Gilbert, a sociology professor at Hamilton College in Clinton, New York, who designed the survey with his students.

The polling firm Zogby International conducted the nationwide telephone survey during three days in June by calling 1,005 high school sophomores, juniors and seniors.

The Alliance for Justice, an anti-gun coalition of advocacy groups, released the study as part of an anti-gun campaign. The poll, financed by the College’s Arthur Levitt Public Affairs Center, had an error margin of plus or minus three percentage points.




In Japan, which U.S. gun grabbers cite as an example of a country with gun control laws which ought to be replicated here, violent crime, including violent crime committed with guns, is on the rise, reports The Washington Post.

Guns, reports the newspaper’s Doug Struck from Tokyo, “play a major role in Japan’s rising rate of violent crime.

“Although Japan has some of the developed world’s most stringent gun restrictions, the number of serious crimes committed with handguns here last year was the highest since the National Police Agency began keeping statistics more than a decade ago. And the rate of gun crimes in the first six months of 2000 promises to exceed that record.

“‘I think the public believes it is safe in Japan,’ said Koichi Sunada, head of a citizens’ anti-gun group in Tokyo. ‘But the situation is changing.’”

“A citizen can buy a hunting rifle, but only after an exhaustive process that includes a lengthy waiting period and a police investigation of the potential buyer’s background. Gun owners overwhelmingly support the tough laws; the Japanese are perplexed at American toleration of easy access to weapons in the face of widespread violence.

“The yazuka are the exception. Experts believe most of the estimated 80,000 underworld members have weapons, and police have been unable or unwilling to dent that figure.”

GO BACK TO TOP


November 2000

A retired Justice Department prosecutor said BATF agents “have sought to intimidate the author of a 1996 novel about a man fighting against corrupt ATF agents,” reported writer James L. Pate recently in The Washington Times.

“In a harshly worded letter to Director Bradley Buckles,” wrote Pate, “lawyer James H. Jeffries III said agents are attempting to ‘suppress’ the fictional account.

“‘Because the book, Unintended Consequences, is highly critical of the (BATF), it appears that some in your agency have undertaken to suppress it and to intimidate its author,’ wrote Mr. Jeffries, who worked almost 28 years as a federal prosecutor before retiring to enter private practice specializing in federal firearms law.

“‘It has long been clear, from repeated court decisions and congressional committee reports, that your agents have no familiarity with the Second, Fourth, Fifth and Sixth Amendments to the United States Constitution,’ Mr. Jeffries stated in the three-page letter to Mr. Buckles. ‘Now it appears that they have not even been introduced to the very first article of the Bill of Rights.’

“John Ross, the author of Unintended Consequences, says ATF agents have harassed vendors of his book and have even tried to enlist his wife as an informant against him.”




“Smith & Wesson Corp.’s gun-safety deal with federal regulators appears to have misfired for the nation’s largest handgun manufacturer,” reports Gary Fields in The Wall Street Journal.

“The company’s chief executive officer, Ed Shultz,” he continued, “signed a code-of-conduct agreement with the Treasury Department and the Department of Housing and Urban Development in March, promising to equip firearms with trigger locks and accept an unusual level of government oversight into the way the company does business.

“For the company, a unit of Britain’s Tomkins PC, the agreement was supposed to allow it to escape government lawsuits being filed against the industry, but Smith & Wesson is still a defendant in all but one of the cases.

“Meanwhile, promises of preferential treatment in government gun purchases – a reward for the company’s commitment to gun safety – have been slow to materialize. In fact, even though HUD Secretary Andrew Cuomo is the Clinton Administration’s point man on the matter, HUD’s Inspector General’s Office recently bought guns from Smith & Wesson rival Glock Inc.”




Gun grabbers in Washington, D. C. early last month announced the initiation of a two-year effort at 300 colleges and universities they said would bring new voices and ideas to the campaign for tighter gun control around the nation.

Coordinating the events, reported The New York Times, were the Alliance for Justice, a liberal group that monitors judicial selections, and Physicians for Social Responsibility, a doctors’ group that advocates stricter gun control laws.

The Million Mom March, the National Education Association and the American Bar Association were among the co-sponsors.

A spokeswoman for the alliance, reported the newspaper, said the campaign sought measures such as mandatory gun owner licensing, safety locks and firearms registration.

Nan Aron, President of the Alliance for Justice, said that the group hoped to put a “human face on the tragedy of gun violence.”

Attorney General Janet Reno appeared at an event in Baltimore, Maryland. The television talk show hostess Rosie O’Donnell and Sen. Charles E. Schumer of New York participated in New York, and Secretary of Housing and Urban Development Andrew M. Cuomo spoke in Washington.




The U. S. Supreme Court, in the case of Navegar v. United States, No. 99-1874, rejected without comment a constitutional challenge to the 1994 law that prohibits the manufacture, sale or possession of certain semiautomatic firearms. The makers of several such firearms, including the TEC-DC9 and TEC-22 semiautomatic handguns, challenged the law on the ground that it exceeded the authority of Congress to regulate interstate commerce.

The challenge, made by Navegar, Inc. and Penn Arms, Inc., was rejected by the U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia, which called the law a permissible “regulation of activities having a substantial effect on interstate commerce.”

One judge on that court, David Sentelle, issued a strong call for the case to be reheard because, he said, the Supreme Court had ruled in a 1995 case striking down the Gun-Free School Zones Act that possession of a gun did not have enough connection with commerce to come within Congress’ regulatory power.

The Clinton-Gore Administration, urging the justices to reject the appeal, said the ban was based on evidence that “the nationwide market for firearms renders purely local prohibitions ineffective” and was not invalidated by the 1995 decision in United States v. Lopez.

GO BACK TO TOP


December 2000

A tiny southern Utah town has passed an ordinance that requires every household to own a gun and ammunition so residents can protect themselves against aggressors, reports The Associated Press.

Jay Lee, the Mayor of Virgin, Utah, a town just north of the Arizona border, told KSL-TV that most of the 350 residents already own firearms so there is a lot of support for the initiative.

The town council passed the ordinance after residents expressed fear that the individual Second Amendment civil right to keep and bear arms itself was under fire.

The move, according to AP, has some Utah residents perplexed.

“The state legislature hasn’t addressed guns on any basis,” said Kim DeMille, of Utah’s Safe to Learn. Safe to Worship Coalition, which is fighting to keep guns out of schools and churches. “I don’t know why they should think their Second Amendment rights are being taken away.”

Virgin residents who don’t comply will not be punished, the Mayor said. He also said exceptions will be made for the mentally ill, convicted felons, conscientious objectors and people who can not afford to buy a gun.

Town leaders say they got the idea from a city in the State of Georgia, Kennesaw, which passed a similar law about a dozen years ago.




A U.S. Department of Justice review indicates that firearm-related injuries in crimes have fallen 40 percent in the five-year period ending in 1997, reports USA Today.

Data gathered from the FBI, hospitals and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention showed that gunshot wounds from any kind of crime dropped from 64,100 to 39,400 during the five-year period.

The data also showed that firearm-related homicides declined by 27 percent, from 18,300 to 13,300. African-Americans represented a disproportionate number of all gunshot victims – almost half – and four out of five victims were male.

Black males ages 15-24 were victims in 26 percent of all non-fatal gun incidents and 22 percent of all gun-related homicides.

The Justice Department review, written by researchers Marianne W. Zawitz and Kevin J. Strom, did not account for the disproportionate number of black victims, but it determined that “most victims of firearm injuries and deaths, suicides and suicide attempts with firearms were white.”

According to the review, juveniles were victims in 16 percent of all non-fatal gunshot wounds inflicted during crimes. They were the victims in 10 percent of gun-related murders.

In 44 percent of slayings, the victims knew their killers. In 15 percent of the cases, the killer was a stranger, and in 41 percent the relationship was not known.




After discovering that gun locks it has distributed can be opened easily, the Knoxville, Tennessee Police Department is recalling some 300 of the devices, reports the Knoxville News-Sentinel.

Project HomeSafe, however, which sent 400,000 of the cable locks to 650 law enforcement agencies across the country, isn’t ready to issue a national recall.

A Knoxville police officer fiddling with one of the cable locks found that it would spring open when bounced against his hand. The officer alerted Police Chief Phil Keith, who ordered a test of the devices, said Craig Griffith, city spokesman.

A check of the 5,000 cable locks Knoxville police were prepared to give away showed that ease of opening was a common trait, authorities said.

“The individuals who received these free gun locks should not assume that the locks will work properly,” Chief Keith said.

When informed by Knoxville police of the discovery, the Chattanooga, Tennessee Police Department issued an alert for people to throw away the 4,500 gun locks it has distributed, said Ed Buice, spokesman for Chattanooga police.

“My biggest concern was that some child would get hurt because a parent had a false sense of security with the device,” Mr. Buice said. “I wish we knew this before we gave them out.”

Knoxville police began distributing the devices as part of an overall so-called Safe Streets Campaign that included buying back guns, paying people to tell police about illegally possessed guns and increasing penalties for gun-toting criminals.




According to preliminary results of a Voter News Service (VNS) exit poll of 13,049 national voters in the November 7 presidential election, with a margin of error of plus or minus 1.1 percentage points, 48 percent of all voters say there is a gun owner in their household and 52 percent say there is not; 36 percent of all Gore voters say there is and 59 percent say there is not; and 60 percent of all Bush voters say there is and 38 percent say there is not. The Associated Press and the ABC, CBS, CNN, Fox and NBC television networks are members of VNS.

GO BACK TO TOP